Last updated: 23rd January 2009 – 12:41pm
Report any broken links, syntax errors, or any general spelling/grammar to dade | deadbadger | org. Some information may not be 100% correct in terms of technical specifications or explanations – I will accept criticism and corrections on those points also, as long as you have a valid argument and verifiable facts.
Thanks,
dade-
As my job as an IT professional, working for a Microsoft reseller and distributor of computer systems and components, it’s a necessity to be up-to-date with my knowledge of the software I’m selling. To this end I acquired the beta of Windows 7 and will be writing a few articles over the next few weeks and months about it. So, here goes.
At a glance Windows 7 is like its predecessor – Windows Vista – in many ways. For the OEM user, installation of Windows 7 is identical in pretty much every way, except from what I saw of the speed of installation. The setup steps, login screens, and user icons are what we’ve seen from Vista and should be familiar territory for those who install Vista on a regular basis. Added to this there is the Aero theme, with its transparent borders and taskbar, is all very similar to that of Vista’s.
This should come as no surprise, as the Vista architecture was an earlier version of Windows 7’s and many similarities remain. Windows 7, however, is very polished and despite being in beta still it seems a very complete OS.
The main improvements, or rather the more important ones from my perspective, is not so obvious at a glance. These changes are within the hood of the operating system. The times for booting up the OS and shutting it down has been improved immensely from what I’ve seen so far. Also, program installation seems to be a lot quicker than I remember Vista ever being even on a fresh installation. There has, apparently, been an improvement in the kernel also. This, however, I cannot verify as I do not know the specifics of it.
The most noticeable difference that users will see is the taskbar. The quicklaunch bar now acts as part of the main task bar itself, where programs and files (documents, movies, music) can be pinned to the bar for quick access. For instance, you can pin a bookmark to the taskbar/quicklaunch bar which will ‘Open with…’ your default web browser. All you then need to do is right-click the browser pin on your quicklaunch bar and select the bookmark.

(Click thumbnail for larger view)
This makes organisation extremely user friendly when you’re going to a particular website, opening a file, or selecting a playlist that you use often.
Another change with the taskbar is the management of currently opened windows. If you have several web pages open, even in tabs, you are able to mouseover the program in question (in the case of the images below, Internet Explorer) and see the currently opened windows or tabs. By moving your mouse over each icon shown in the preview, all other windows become a transparent panel with an outline showing only the page or window you are currently mousing over. The following thumbnails show this better.

(Click thumbnail for larger view)

(Click thumbnail for larger view)

(Click thumbnail for larger view)
Core Windows Programs :: MSPaint, WordPad, and beyond
I was almost tempted not to open MSPaint when first I started writing this, as I expected it to be a complete utter pile of crap; however, I’m supposed to be providing people with information so I had to brace myself for it and get it over and done with quickly. I was pleasantly surprised.

(Click thumbnail for larger view)
Paint has been revamped, and has a very similar style of menus as the Microsoft Office 2007 suite. There are a few brushes to help with some simple artwork, and the effects are pretty good for something that is essentially free with the OS. Not to mention the quality of the saved files is much better than I remember in previous version, with PNG files being the standard format. I’m suitably impressed, and all these screenshots you see on these articles were edited in MSPaint. :)
WordPad is now a fully fledge Word Processing tool. This also has been made to look very ‘Office 2007′ with regards to its menus. It does what you would expect from a simple Word Processor, with the added extra of being able to save in .rtf (Rich Text), .docx (Office 2007 file extension), .txt (Notepad), and .odt (OpenOffice.org format). It’s what I’m currently using to write this overview.

(Click thumbnail for larger view)
One of my favourite bundled pieces of software has to be SnippingTool though. It allows you take draw a box across your screen, taking a capture of the selected area ‘as is’ and creates a picture that you can annotate, highlight, and mark out points of interest. It’s a brilliant tool for creating picture-driven tutorials, and I may find myself using this for future articles!

(Click thumbnail for larger view)

(Click thumbnail for larger view)
Driver Support :: 64-bit of a pain in the ass?
As I am running the 64-bit version of the Windows 7 OS, I thought I’d try the driver compatibility. Long have drivers been the bane of 64-bit Windows, dating back to XP, and so I wanted to see if this bane still thwarts us.
Windows 7 driver support uses the same architecture and idea that Vista – and indeed XP to an extent – used. When a new device is detected for the first time, 7 will search its drivers database and install the most up-to-date and compatible driver. NIC’s are generally not a problem and 7 will find most, if not all, NIC’s along with USB adapters and sound drivers.
Having used Vista, I was dubious about the driver support of some select pieces of hardware. Most importantly I was sceptical about it finding the right video drivers form my graphics card. I am running ATi 4870 512MB, and checked the latest drivers on ATi’s website to check the versions. The version that was installed on there after a fresh install and no prompt to update: 8.53.2.12. The version that was installed after a Windows driver update prompt: 8.56.1.4. The version from ATi’s website is 8.561.0.0. That’s quite impressive for a straight-off-the-disc installation, and certainly a vast improvement from Vista’s driver management when it came to graphics cards.
In answer to the question in the heading: No it’s not a pain in the ass. It’s actually very good.
Internet Explorer 8 (IE8) :: Should I even bother?
If you’re an avid FireFox user then you’re unlikely to be persuaded to switch back to using IE, but it at least warrants a quick test play. After all, they have changed a lot and improved several parts behind the scenes to make things just that little bit more user friendly.
For instance:
There is the use of Accelerators, which allows you to open up a list of options once a set of text has been highlighted. These options range from translation to posting the highlighted snippet onto your Live Spaces blog page.
InPrivate browsing, which works very similarly to Google Chrome’s Incognito mode. Your browser works in a one-night-stand mode where all site history, cookies, and logins/passwords are automatically removed once the InPrivate session has ended.
My favourite feature so far with the new IE8 is the automatic crash recovery. Upon reading more into the mechanics of IE8, I’ve discovered that the frame is run on a different processing thread to each tab. In the same way, each tab of the browser is run on a separate process to each other. What this effectively does is in the case where a page would make previously released browsers crash and stop responding, IE8 is able to isolate the problem to the specific tab and force it to kill that process before rebooting again. A fantastic idea, though it does create more of a stress load on the system by making it run several processes. While some criticise this as being a bad point, I would say it was a good point for smoother browsing.
Conclusion
Considering this is a beta version of the software, currently in Build 7000 when this article was written, it is a very stable piece of software. It has a *lot* of potential. I sell computer systems, components, software, and the main OS that is supplied in my workplace is Windows. In the years I’ve used Windows I’ve not seen a version that has been this stable on release date, let alone in beta.
Windows 7 has a few problems here and there, but that’s to be expected. For the nay-sayers claiming Vista is a terrible OS, you need to understand that Vista was a filler to give 7 time to be developed. It feels like Vista in many ways while being so much better in many others, which is also to be expected as Vista was built using a similar (if not the same) architecture. The improvements with speed and efficiency is down to 7’s algorithms – at least that’s what I’d imagine, having previously studied some algorithms for running time in computing – and I will bet that most people will notice the decrease in boot sequence times, shutdown times, and a few of those people may even notice the software installation speeds.
I realise I haven’t covered a lot of areas that some people might wish to know about Windows 7, but I’ve yet to test everything extensively and put together my opinions. However, this isn’t my last piece of literature on Windows 7. I will be releasing more in-depth look at visual customisation, and running a few other performance and stability tests shortly.
Popularity: 19% [?]